From 52b26713bebf3a6724d924a10719fb9ab936e694 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erik Verbruggen <erikjv@me.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:37:14 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Mark invalid RecordDecls as completed.

Sema::ActOnTag creates TagDecls for records. However, if those record
declarations are invalid, and the parser is in C++ mode, it would
silently drop the TagDecl (and leave it as "beingDefined"). The problem
is that other code (e.g. the ASTWriter) will serialize all types, and
expects them to be complete. So, leaving them open would result in
failing asserts.

Fixes PR20320

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21176

llvm-svn: 285275
---
 clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp                |  9 ++++++++-
 clang/test/Index/pr20320.cpp               |  2 ++
 clang/test/Index/pr20320.h                 | 14 ++++++++++++++
 clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp |  6 +++++-
 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 clang/test/Index/pr20320.cpp
 create mode 100644 clang/test/Index/pr20320.h

diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
index e9e0f5e..c8973ae 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -13386,7 +13386,14 @@ CreateNewDecl:
   OwnedDecl = true;
   // In C++, don't return an invalid declaration. We can't recover well from
   // the cases where we make the type anonymous.
-  return (Invalid && getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) ? nullptr : New;
+  if (Invalid && getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
+    if (New->isBeingDefined())
+      if (auto RD = dyn_cast<RecordDecl>(New))
+        RD->completeDefinition();
+    return nullptr;
+  } else {
+    return New;
+  }
 }
 
 void Sema::ActOnTagStartDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *TagD) {
diff --git a/clang/test/Index/pr20320.cpp b/clang/test/Index/pr20320.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cb54cea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Index/pr20320.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+// RUN: env CINDEXTEST_EDITING=1 c-index-test -test-load-source-reparse 5 local -x c++ %s
+#include "pr20320.h"
diff --git a/clang/test/Index/pr20320.h b/clang/test/Index/pr20320.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9dbb730
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/Index/pr20320.h
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+#ifndef pr20320_h
+#define pr20320_h
+
+template<>
+struct S< ::Number::One>
+{
+};
+
+template<>
+struct S< ::Number::Two>
+{
+};
+
+#endif
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp
index 3f494cc..c725a0d 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp
@@ -434,8 +434,12 @@ namespace PR18234 {
   struct A {
     operator enum E { e } (); // expected-error {{'PR18234::A::E' cannot be defined in a type specifier}}
     operator struct S { int n; } (); // expected-error {{'PR18234::A::S' cannot be defined in a type specifier}}
+    // expected-note@-1 {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'struct A' to 'const PR18234::A::S &' for 1st argument}}
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+  // expected-note@-3 {{candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'struct A' to 'PR18234::A::S &&' for 1st argument}}
+#endif
   } a;
-  A::S s = a;
+  A::S s = a; // expected-error {{no viable conversion from 'struct A' to 'A::S'}}
   A::E e = a; // expected-note {{here}}
   bool k1 = e == A::e; // expected-error {{no member named 'e'}}
   bool k2 = e.n == 0;
-- 
2.7.4