From 5231d38c16f0896171b45133d4ea6f6bc6610c82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Can Guo Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 02:14:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Do not free irq in suspend Since ufshcd irq resource is allocated with the device resource management aware IRQ request implementation, we don't really need to free up irq during suspend, disabling it during suspend and reenabling it during resume should be good enough. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0101016ed3d69793-22918f99-23bf-495d-8a36-a9c108d1cbce-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu Signed-off-by: Can Guo Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 18 ++++-------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index c1f92ee..e5cd57e 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -266,26 +266,18 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_valid_tag(struct ufs_hba *hba, int tag) return tag >= 0 && tag < hba->nutrs; } -static inline int ufshcd_enable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba) +static inline void ufshcd_enable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba) { - int ret = 0; - if (!hba->is_irq_enabled) { - ret = request_irq(hba->irq, ufshcd_intr, IRQF_SHARED, UFSHCD, - hba); - if (ret) - dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: request_irq failed, ret=%d\n", - __func__, ret); + enable_irq(hba->irq); hba->is_irq_enabled = true; } - - return ret; } static inline void ufshcd_disable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba) { if (hba->is_irq_enabled) { - free_irq(hba->irq, hba); + disable_irq(hba->irq); hba->is_irq_enabled = false; } } @@ -7959,9 +7951,7 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) goto out; /* enable the host irq as host controller would be active soon */ - ret = ufshcd_enable_irq(hba); - if (ret) - goto disable_irq_and_vops_clks; + ufshcd_enable_irq(hba); ret = ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm(hba); if (ret) -- 2.7.4