From 4ea9439fd537313f3381f0af4ebbf05e3f51a58c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Woodhouse Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 13:48:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/xen: Validate port number in SCHEDOP_poll We shouldn't allow guests to poll on arbitrary port numbers off the end of the event channel table. Fixes: 1a65105a5aba ("KVM: x86/xen: handle PV spinlocks slowpath") [dwmw2: my bug though; the original version did check the validity as a side-effect of an idr_find() which I ripped out in refactoring.] Reported-by: Michal Luczaj Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c index 2dae413..dc2f304 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c @@ -954,6 +954,14 @@ static int kvm_xen_hypercall_complete_userspace(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return kvm_xen_hypercall_set_result(vcpu, run->xen.u.hcall.result); } +static inline int max_evtchn_port(struct kvm *kvm) +{ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && kvm->arch.xen.long_mode) + return EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS; + else + return COMPAT_EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS; +} + static bool wait_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int nr_ports, evtchn_port_t *ports) { @@ -1042,6 +1050,10 @@ static bool kvm_xen_schedop_poll(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool longmode, *r = -EFAULT; goto out; } + if (ports[i] >= max_evtchn_port(vcpu->kvm)) { + *r = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } } if (sched_poll.nr_ports == 1) @@ -1297,14 +1309,6 @@ int kvm_xen_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return 0; } -static inline int max_evtchn_port(struct kvm *kvm) -{ - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && kvm->arch.xen.long_mode) - return EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS; - else - return COMPAT_EVTCHN_2L_NR_CHANNELS; -} - static void kvm_xen_check_poller(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int port) { int poll_evtchn = vcpu->arch.xen.poll_evtchn; -- 2.7.4