From 4d286c89e412fc2eaa1b8988481d2f32b5e3826f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 14:05:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] perf ui progress: Make sure we always define step value Unlikely, but we could have ui_progress__init being called with total < 16, which would set the next and step variables to 0. That would force unnecessary ui_progress__ops->update calls because 'next' would never raise. Forcing the next and step values to be always > 0. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: David Ahern Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170908120510.22515-2-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/ui/progress.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/progress.c b/tools/perf/ui/progress.c index a0f24c7..a9c1580 100644 --- a/tools/perf/ui/progress.c +++ b/tools/perf/ui/progress.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ void ui_progress__update(struct ui_progress *p, u64 adv) void ui_progress__init(struct ui_progress *p, u64 total, const char *title) { p->curr = 0; - p->next = p->step = total / 16; + p->next = p->step = total / 16 ?: 1; p->total = total; p->title = title; -- 2.7.4