From 4ca9a5821972b431cb94c6a1ac69a64aefe1c17d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Wajdeczko Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:31:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Remove stale comment for q_fail This member was dropped long time ago. Fixes: 774439e1 ("drm/i915/guc: re-optimise i915_guc_client layout") Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170518113104.54400-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson (cherry picked from commit 4afc67be8e203ee8f5e95e829c0777eae7a14702) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h index 4b7f73aeddac..f84115261ae7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h @@ -59,8 +59,6 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_request; * available in the work queue (note, the queue is shared, * not per-engine). It is OK for this to be nonzero, but * it should not be huge! - * q_fail: failed to enqueue a work item. This should never happen, - * because we check for space beforehand. * b_fail: failed to ring the doorbell. This should never happen, unless * somehow the hardware misbehaves, or maybe if the GuC firmware * crashes? We probably need to reset the GPU to recover. -- 2.34.1