From 4bba7f7def6f278266dadf845da472cfbfed784e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oliver Upton Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:47:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Use config_lock to protect data ordered against KVM_RUN There are various bits of VM-scoped data that can only be configured before the first call to KVM_RUN, such as the hypercall bitmaps and the PMU. As these fields are protected by the kvm->lock and accessed while holding vcpu->mutex, this is yet another example of lock inversion. Change out the kvm->lock for kvm->arch.config_lock in all of these instances. Opportunistically simplify the locking mechanics of the PMU configuration by holding the config_lock for the entirety of kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(). Note that this also addresses a couple of bugs. There is an unguarded read of the PMU version in KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER which could race with KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_PMU. Additionally, until now writes to the per-vCPU vPMU irq were not serialized VM-wide, meaning concurrent calls to KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ could lead to a false positive in pmu_irq_is_valid(). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Jeremy Linton Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327164747.2466958-4-oliver.upton@linux.dev --- arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++-- arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 2 ++ arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 4 ++-- arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 23 ++++++----------------- 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c index 1620ec3..fd8d355 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c @@ -624,9 +624,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm)) kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_vcpu_init_traps, vcpu); - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock); set_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &kvm->arch.flags); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock); return ret; } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index 07444fa..481c79c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c @@ -957,7 +957,9 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, switch (attr->group) { case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL: + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock); ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(vcpu, attr); + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.config_lock); break; case KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_CTRL: ret = kvm_arm_timer_set_attr(vcpu, attr); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c index 5da884e..fbdbf42 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_set_fw_reg_bmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg_id, u64 val) if (val & ~fw_reg_features) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock); if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &kvm->arch.flags) && val != *fw_reg_bmap) { @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_set_fw_reg_bmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg_id, u64 val) WRITE_ONCE(*fw_reg_bmap, val); out: - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock); return ret; } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c index 2490840..2401684 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c @@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int pmu_id) struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu; int ret = -ENXIO; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->arch.config_lock); mutex_lock(&arm_pmus_lock); list_for_each_entry(entry, &arm_pmus, entry) { @@ -894,7 +894,6 @@ static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int pmu_id) } mutex_unlock(&arm_pmus_lock); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); return ret; } @@ -902,22 +901,20 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) { struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; + lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->arch.config_lock); + if (!kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu)) return -ENODEV; if (vcpu->arch.pmu.created) return -EBUSY; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); if (!kvm->arch.arm_pmu) { /* No PMU set, get the default one */ kvm->arch.arm_pmu = kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu(); - if (!kvm->arch.arm_pmu) { - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + if (!kvm->arch.arm_pmu) return -ENODEV; - } } - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); switch (attr->attr) { case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: { @@ -961,19 +958,13 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) filter.action != KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY)) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); - - if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &kvm->arch.flags)) { - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &kvm->arch.flags)) return -EBUSY; - } if (!kvm->arch.pmu_filter) { kvm->arch.pmu_filter = bitmap_alloc(nr_events, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT); - if (!kvm->arch.pmu_filter) { - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + if (!kvm->arch.pmu_filter) return -ENOMEM; - } /* * The default depends on the first applied filter. @@ -992,8 +983,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) else bitmap_clear(kvm->arch.pmu_filter, filter.base_event, filter.nevents); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); - return 0; } case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_PMU: { -- 2.7.4