From 4b62c0f1e76fe3327b695c49195af8b58e4da057 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:35:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] sh: No need to explicitly include <linux/rwlock.h>.

Since <linux/spinlock.h> already includes <linux/rwlock.h>, and the
latter file will warn about not having included the former file
anyway, there is no value in including rwlock.h explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
---
 arch/sh/mm/pmb.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c b/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c
index 198bcff..35b364f 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/rwlock.h>
 #include <asm/sizes.h>
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
-- 
2.7.4