From 494dac0c9f1bb90c8b2886eb14554579ece202d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Modra Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 06:47:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * elf64-ppc.c (func_desc_adjust): Give linker created function descriptor symbols a size and type. (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Correct lq insn test. --- bfd/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ bfd/elf64-ppc.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog index 3c71b89..1f3b785 100644 --- a/bfd/ChangeLog +++ b/bfd/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2003-07-29 Alan Modra + + * elf64-ppc.c (func_desc_adjust): Give linker created function + descriptor symbols a size and type. + (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Correct lq insn test. + 2003-07-28 Eric Christopher * elf32-ppc.c (R_PPC_RELAX32): New relocation. diff --git a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c index dda658d..07ba432 100644 --- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c +++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c @@ -4310,6 +4310,8 @@ func_desc_adjust (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h, void *inf) } fdh = (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) bh; fdh->elf_link_hash_flags &= ~ELF_LINK_NON_ELF; + fdh->size = 24; + fdh->type = STT_OBJECT; } if (fdh != NULL @@ -8434,7 +8436,7 @@ ppc64_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd, _DS relocs bloats all reloc switches in this file. It doesn't seem to make much sense to use any of these relocs in data, so testing the insn should be safe. */ - if ((insn & (0x3f << 26)) == (56 << 26)) + if ((insn & (0x3f << 26)) == (56u << 26)) mask = 15; if (((relocation + addend) & mask) != 0) { -- 2.7.4