From 47317fc671589ac48bf66dd15fe4cfd7d2dc6674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marek Safar <marek.safar@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:07:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Call used comparer directly instead of non-generic Compare
 wrapper (#51001)

---
 src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Type.Enum.cs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Type.Enum.cs b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Type.Enum.cs
index a025edb..8915fc4 100644
--- a/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Type.Enum.cs
+++ b/src/libraries/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Type.Enum.cs
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ namespace System
             // Insertion Sort these values in ascending order.
             // We use this O(n^2) algorithm, but it turns out that most of the time the elements are already in sorted order and
             // the common case performance will be faster than quick sorting this.
-            IComparer comparer = Comparer<object>.Default;
+            Comparer comparer = Comparer.Default;
             for (int i = 1; i < values.Length; i++)
             {
                 int j = i;
-- 
2.7.4