From 43c2e885be25311e6289c7da52e8a03c4453ee03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:19:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] nfs4: fix channel attribute sanity-checks The sanity checks here are incorrect; in the worst case they allow values that crash the client. They're also over-reliant on the preprocessor. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 7e14e99..32c8758 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -4842,49 +4842,56 @@ static void nfs4_init_channel_attrs(struct nfs41_create_session_args *args) args->bc_attrs.max_reqs); } -static int _verify_channel_attr(char *chan, char *attr_name, u32 sent, u32 rcvd) +static int nfs4_verify_fore_channel_attrs(struct nfs41_create_session_args *args, struct nfs4_session *session) { - if (rcvd <= sent) - return 0; - printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Session INVALID: %s channel %s increased. " - "sent=%u rcvd=%u\n", __func__, chan, attr_name, sent, rcvd); - return -EINVAL; + struct nfs4_channel_attrs *sent = &args->fc_attrs; + struct nfs4_channel_attrs *rcvd = &session->fc_attrs; + + if (rcvd->headerpadsz > sent->headerpadsz) + return -EINVAL; + if (rcvd->max_resp_sz > sent->max_resp_sz) + return -EINVAL; + /* + * Our requested max_ops is the minimum we need; we're not + * prepared to break up compounds into smaller pieces than that. + * So, no point even trying to continue if the server won't + * cooperate: + */ + if (rcvd->max_ops < sent->max_ops) + return -EINVAL; + if (rcvd->max_reqs == 0) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; } -#define _verify_fore_channel_attr(_name_) \ - _verify_channel_attr("fore", #_name_, \ - args->fc_attrs._name_, \ - session->fc_attrs._name_) +static int nfs4_verify_back_channel_attrs(struct nfs41_create_session_args *args, struct nfs4_session *session) +{ + struct nfs4_channel_attrs *sent = &args->bc_attrs; + struct nfs4_channel_attrs *rcvd = &session->bc_attrs; -#define _verify_back_channel_attr(_name_) \ - _verify_channel_attr("back", #_name_, \ - args->bc_attrs._name_, \ - session->bc_attrs._name_) + if (rcvd->max_rqst_sz > sent->max_rqst_sz) + return -EINVAL; + if (rcvd->max_resp_sz < sent->max_resp_sz) + return -EINVAL; + if (rcvd->max_resp_sz_cached > sent->max_resp_sz_cached) + return -EINVAL; + /* These would render the backchannel useless: */ + if (rcvd->max_ops == 0) + return -EINVAL; + if (rcvd->max_reqs == 0) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; +} -/* - * The server is not allowed to increase the fore channel header pad size, - * maximum response size, or maximum number of operations. - * - * The back channel attributes are only negotiatied down: We send what the - * (back channel) server insists upon. - */ static int nfs4_verify_channel_attrs(struct nfs41_create_session_args *args, struct nfs4_session *session) { - int ret = 0; - - ret |= _verify_fore_channel_attr(headerpadsz); - ret |= _verify_fore_channel_attr(max_resp_sz); - ret |= _verify_fore_channel_attr(max_ops); - - ret |= _verify_back_channel_attr(headerpadsz); - ret |= _verify_back_channel_attr(max_rqst_sz); - ret |= _verify_back_channel_attr(max_resp_sz); - ret |= _verify_back_channel_attr(max_resp_sz_cached); - ret |= _verify_back_channel_attr(max_ops); - ret |= _verify_back_channel_attr(max_reqs); + int ret; - return ret; + ret = nfs4_verify_fore_channel_attrs(args, session); + if (ret) + return ret; + return nfs4_verify_back_channel_attrs(args, session); } static int _nfs4_proc_create_session(struct nfs_client *clp) -- 2.7.4