From 413d61008131c8ea22312164ba498075ce2fccc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Ian King Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:07:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] cifs: fix spelling mistake, EACCESS -> EACCES Trivial fix to a spelling mistake of the error access name EACCESS, rename to EACCES Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: Steve French --- fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +- fs/cifs/inode.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index e262a05..542d882 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/file.c +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock) * Set the byte-range lock (mandatory style). Returns: * 1) 0, if we set the lock and don't need to request to the server; * 2) 1, if no locks prevent us but we need to request to the server; - * 3) -EACCESS, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false. + * 3) -EACCES, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false. */ static int cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock, diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c index 1023d78..a81a9df 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/inode.c +++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c @@ -1320,8 +1320,8 @@ cifs_drop_nlink(struct inode *inode) /* * If d_inode(dentry) is null (usually meaning the cached dentry * is a negative dentry) then we would attempt a standard SMB delete, but - * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCESS - * but will return the EACCESS to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call + * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCES + * but will return the EACCES to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call * unlink on negative dentries currently. */ int cifs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) -- 2.7.4