From 400d2132288edbd6d500f45eab5d85526ca94e46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sean Christopherson Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 18:14:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Return the local "r" variable from svm_set_msr() Rename "r" to "ret" and actually return it from svm_set_msr() to reduce the probability of repeating the mistake of commit 723d5fb0ffe4 ("kvm: svm: Add IA32_FLUSH_CMD guest support"), which set "r" thinking that it would be propagated to the caller. Alternatively, the declaration of "r" could be moved into the handling of MSR_TSC_AUX, but that risks variable shadowing in the future. A wrapper for kvm_set_user_return_msr() would allow eliding a local variable, but that feels like delaying the inevitable. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Message-Id: <20230322011440.2195485-7-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c index b32edaf..57f241c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c @@ -2873,7 +2873,7 @@ static int svm_set_vm_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data) static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) { struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); - int r; + int ret = 0; u32 ecx = msr->index; u64 data = msr->data; @@ -2995,10 +2995,10 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) * guest via direct_access_msrs, and switch it via user return. */ preempt_disable(); - r = kvm_set_user_return_msr(tsc_aux_uret_slot, data, -1ull); + ret = kvm_set_user_return_msr(tsc_aux_uret_slot, data, -1ull); preempt_enable(); - if (r) - return 1; + if (ret) + break; svm->tsc_aux = data; break; @@ -3056,7 +3056,7 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr) default: return kvm_set_msr_common(vcpu, msr); } - return 0; + return ret; } static int msr_interception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -- 2.7.4