From 3e74aeeda66f6369f7a0559018f4a10696dcb820 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Kettenis Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 20:50:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * dwarf2-frame.c: Fix another comment. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 2 ++ gdb/dwarf2-frame.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 39def0c..5b7d4d2 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ 2003-11-27 Mark Kettenis + * dwarf2-frame.c: Fix another comment. + * x86-64-tdep.c (RET_INT_REGS, RET_SSE_REGS): Remove defines. (x86_64_use_struct_convention, x86_64_extract_return_value, x86_64_store_return_value): Remove. diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c index 43bed21..ccad418 100644 --- a/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c +++ b/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ enum dwarf2_reg_rule /* Make certain that 0 maps onto the correct enum value; the corresponding structure is being initialized using memset zero. This indicates that CFI didn't provide any information at all - about a register, leaving how to obtain it's value totally + about a register, leaving how to obtain its value totally unspecified. */ REG_UNSPECIFIED = 0, /* The term "undefined" comes from the DWARF2 CFI spec which this -- 2.7.4