From 3e44dce4d0aeb3582b87c7bb8a79d69fa406eee5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lai Jiangshan Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 20:25:47 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Move PTE present check from loop body to __shadow_walk_next() So far, the loop bodies already ensure the PTE is present before calling __shadow_walk_next(): Some loop bodies simply exit with a !PRESENT directly and some other loop bodies, i.e. FNAME(fetch) and __direct_map() do not currently guard their walks with is_shadow_present_pte, but only because they install present non-leaf SPTEs in the loop itself. But checking pte present in __shadow_walk_next() (which is called from shadow_walk_okay()) is more prudent; walking past a !PRESENT SPTE would lead to attempting to read a the next level SPTE from a garbage iter->shadow_addr. It also allows to remove the is_shadow_present_pte() checks from the loop bodies. Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Message-Id: <20210906122547.263316-2-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 13 ++----------- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 73aa15e..7ef9c00 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ static bool shadow_walk_okay(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator) static void __shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator, u64 spte) { - if (is_last_spte(spte, iterator->level)) { + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte) || is_last_spte(spte, iterator->level)) { iterator->level = 0; return; } @@ -3189,9 +3189,6 @@ static u64 *fast_pf_get_last_sptep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u64 *spte) for_each_shadow_entry_lockless(vcpu, gpa, iterator, old_spte) { sptep = iterator.sptep; *spte = old_spte; - - if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte)) - break; } return sptep; @@ -3759,9 +3756,6 @@ static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes, int *root_level spte = mmu_spte_get_lockless(iterator.sptep); sptes[leaf] = spte; - - if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte)) - break; } return leaf; @@ -3877,11 +3871,8 @@ static void shadow_page_table_clear_flood(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr) u64 spte; walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(vcpu); - for_each_shadow_entry_lockless(vcpu, addr, iterator, spte) { + for_each_shadow_entry_lockless(vcpu, addr, iterator, spte) clear_sp_write_flooding_count(iterator.sptep); - if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte)) - break; - } walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(vcpu); } diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h index 08f466a..b908d2f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, hpa_t root_hpa) FNAME(prefetch_gpte)(vcpu, sp, sptep, gpte, false); } - if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) || !sp->unsync_children) + if (!sp->unsync_children) break; } write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); -- 2.7.4