From 3e152aa984ff4f639f7d2daf1ad10d408c0a3332 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jin Yao Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 22:16:52 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] perf block-info: Fix wrong block address comparison in block_info__cmp() Commit 6041441870ab ("perf block: Cleanup and refactor block info functions") introduces block_info__cmp(), which compares two blocks. But the issues are: 1. It should return the strcmp cmp value only if it's not 0. 2. When symbol names are matched, we need to compare the addresses of blocks further. But it wrongly uses the symbol addresses for comparison. 3. If the syms are both NULL, we can't consider these two blocks are matched. This patch fixes above 3 issues. Fixes: 6041441870ab ("perf block: Cleanup and refactor block info functions") Signed-off-by: Jin Yao Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Jin Yao Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kan Liang Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200202141655.32053-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/block-info.c | 21 ++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c index fbbb6d6..5b42146 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c @@ -74,30 +74,21 @@ int64_t block_info__cmp(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused, if (!bi_l->sym || !bi_r->sym) { if (!bi_l->sym && !bi_r->sym) - return 0; + return -1; else if (!bi_l->sym) return -1; else return 1; } - if (bi_l->sym == bi_r->sym) { - if (bi_l->start == bi_r->start) { - if (bi_l->end == bi_r->end) - return 0; - else - return (int64_t)(bi_r->end - bi_l->end); - } else - return (int64_t)(bi_r->start - bi_l->start); - } else { - cmp = strcmp(bi_l->sym->name, bi_r->sym->name); + cmp = strcmp(bi_l->sym->name, bi_r->sym->name); + if (cmp) return cmp; - } - if (bi_l->sym->start != bi_r->sym->start) - return (int64_t)(bi_r->sym->start - bi_l->sym->start); + if (bi_l->start != bi_r->start) + return (int64_t)(bi_r->start - bi_l->start); - return (int64_t)(bi_r->sym->end - bi_l->sym->end); + return (int64_t)(bi_r->end - bi_l->end); } static void init_block_info(struct block_info *bi, struct symbol *sym, -- 2.7.4