From 3bbb24b20a8800158c33eca8564f432dd14d0bf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:01:07 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock with nested trans handles Zach found this deadlock that would happen like this btrfs_end_transaction <- reduce trans->use_count to 0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs btrfs_cow_block find_free_extent btrfs_start_transaction <- increase trans->use_count to 1 allocate chunk btrfs_end_transaction <- decrease trans->use_count to 0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs lock tree block we are cowing above ^^ We need to only decrease trans->use_count if it is above 1, otherwise leave it alone. This will make nested trans be the only ones who decrease their added ref, and will let us get rid of the trans->use_count++ hack if we have to commit the transaction. Thanks, cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Zach Brown Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Tested-by: Zach Brown Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 14 ++++---------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index a999b85..a04707f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -683,7 +683,8 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, int lock = (trans->type != TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK); int err = 0; - if (--trans->use_count) { + if (trans->use_count > 1) { + trans->use_count--; trans->block_rsv = trans->orig_rsv; return 0; } @@ -731,17 +732,10 @@ static int __btrfs_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } if (lock && ACCESS_ONCE(cur_trans->state) == TRANS_STATE_BLOCKED) { - if (throttle) { - /* - * We may race with somebody else here so end up having - * to call end_transaction on ourselves again, so inc - * our use_count. - */ - trans->use_count++; + if (throttle) return btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root); - } else { + else wake_up_process(info->transaction_kthread); - } } if (trans->type & __TRANS_FREEZABLE) -- 2.7.4