From 39f26098c94a6d931e6d6757ac50c24ecf362e18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Watanabe Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 20:34:54 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] network: update log message Follow-up for 7f474ed78df138677557fb43701efeb6e2588c6f and 44e891bbf6908e494856fcf3011e88a70a12e087. --- src/network/networkd-manager.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/network/networkd-manager.c b/src/network/networkd-manager.c index 33b7ec1..5b2581a 100644 --- a/src/network/networkd-manager.c +++ b/src/network/networkd-manager.c @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_route(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message, vo r = sd_netlink_message_read_u32(message, RTA_OIF, &ifindex); if (r == -ENODATA) { - log_debug("rtnl: received route without ifindex, ignoring"); + log_debug("rtnl: received route message without ifindex, ignoring"); return 0; } else if (r < 0) { log_warning_errno(r, "rtnl: could not get ifindex from route message, ignoring: %m"); @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_route(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message, vo /* when enumerating we might be out of sync, but we will * get the route again, so just ignore it */ if (!m->enumerating) - log_warning("rtnl: received route for link (%d) we do not know about, ignoring", ifindex); + log_warning("rtnl: received route message for link (%d) we do not know about, ignoring", ifindex); return 0; } @@ -391,43 +391,43 @@ int manager_rtnl_process_route(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message *message, vo r = sd_rtnl_message_route_get_dst_prefixlen(message, &dst_prefixlen); if (r < 0) { - log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route with invalid destination prefixlen, ignoring: %m"); + log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route message with invalid destination prefixlen, ignoring: %m"); return 0; } r = sd_rtnl_message_route_get_src_prefixlen(message, &src_prefixlen); if (r < 0) { - log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route with invalid source prefixlen, ignoring: %m"); + log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route message with invalid source prefixlen, ignoring: %m"); return 0; } r = sd_rtnl_message_route_get_scope(message, &scope); if (r < 0) { - log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route with invalid scope, ignoring: %m"); + log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route message with invalid scope, ignoring: %m"); return 0; } r = sd_rtnl_message_route_get_tos(message, &tos); if (r < 0) { - log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route with invalid tos, ignoring: %m"); + log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route message with invalid tos, ignoring: %m"); return 0; } r = sd_rtnl_message_route_get_type(message, &rt_type); if (r < 0) { - log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route with invalid type, ignoring: %m"); + log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route message with invalid type, ignoring: %m"); return 0; } r = sd_rtnl_message_route_get_table(message, &table); if (r < 0) { - log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route with invalid table, ignoring: %m"); + log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route message with invalid table, ignoring: %m"); return 0; } r = sd_netlink_message_read_u32(message, RTA_PRIORITY, &priority); if (r < 0 && r != -ENODATA) { - log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route with invalid priority, ignoring: %m"); + log_link_warning_errno(link, r, "rtnl: received route message with invalid priority, ignoring: %m"); return 0; } -- 2.7.4