From 34f9943ef73797e5db1039d888785b0bc5f220e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:46:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] expr8.C: New test.

	* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr8.C: New test.
	* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr6.C: Remove XFAIL.

From-SVN: r34807
---
 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog                   |  5 +++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr6.C |  2 --
 gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr8.C | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr8.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index bbf56f8..3cacd41 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2000-06-30  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@codesourcery.com>
+
+	* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr8.C: New test.
+	* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr6.C: Remove XFAIL.
+
 2000-06-29  Nick Clifton  <nickc@cygnus.com>
 
 	* gcc.c-torture/compile/20000629-1.c: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr6.C
index e1d38de..f3db16e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr6.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr6.C
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 
 // Based on a bug report by tveldhui <tveldhui@extreme.indiana.edu>
 
-// excess errors test - XFAIL *-*-*
-
 template <int X> class foo {};
 
 foo< true ? 1 : 0 > bar;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr8.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr8.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..93dc76d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/expr8.C
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// Build don't link:
+
+// Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+// Contributed by Nathan Sidwell 23 June 2000 <nathan@codesourcery.com>
+
+// Origin GNATS bug report 10 from Ewgenij Gawrilow <gawrilow@math.TU-Berlin.DE> 
+// There is a grammar ambiguity with greater-than compare as a default
+// template parameter value or template arg list. 14.2/2 and 14.1/15
+// say how to resolve it, but we'd sometimes get it wrong.
+
+template <int> class C { };
+
+void f()
+{
+C<1> c1;
+C<1 & 2> c2;
+C<1>2> c3; // ERROR - parse error
+C<(1>2)> c4;
+C<1 & 2>2> c5; // ERROR - parse error
+C<1 & (2>2)> c6;
+}
+
+template <int i = 3>4 > class X1 {}; // ERROR - parse error
+template <int i = 3&&4>0 > class X2 {}; // ERROR - parse error
+template <int i = 3&&4 > class X3 {};
+template <int i = (3>4) > class X4 {};
-- 
2.7.4