From 34c7ded8c28fd9d9e312c49e583c3a93920514b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rasmus Villemoes Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:54:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: Revert "mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: add erratum A-009204 support" commit 8b6dc6b2d60221e90703babbc141f063b8a07e72 upstream. This reverts commit 5dd195522562542bc6ebe6e7bd47890d8b7ca93c. First, the fix seems to be plain wrong, since the erratum suggests waiting 5ms before setting setting SYSCTL[RSTD], but this msleep() happens after the call of sdhci_reset() which is where that bit gets set (if SDHCI_RESET_DATA is in mask). Second, walking the whole device tree to figure out if some node has a "fsl,p2020-esdhc" compatible string is hugely expensive - about 70 to 100 us on our mpc8309 board. Walking the device tree is done under a raw_spin_lock, so this is obviously really bad on an -rt system, and a waste of time on all. In fact, since esdhc_reset() seems to get called around 100 times per second, that mpc8309 now spends 0.8% of its time determining that it is not a p2020. Whether those 100 calls/s are normal or due to some other bug or misconfiguration, regularly hitting a 100 us non-preemptible window is unacceptable. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204085447.27491-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c index 6627523..30d7f66 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c @@ -648,9 +648,6 @@ static void esdhc_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask) sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE); sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE); - if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,p2020-esdhc")) - mdelay(5); - if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL) { val = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_TBCTL); val &= ~ESDHC_TB_EN; -- 2.7.4