From 320217668e066d12e20085dabe71f6f4b058e2dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sanjay Patel Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:04:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix typos in comments; NFC llvm-svn: 244609 --- llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp index 1962402..b001caa 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp @@ -1718,9 +1718,9 @@ struct LoopVectorize : public FunctionPass { // Check the function attributes to find out if this function should be // optimized for size. - bool OptForSize = Hints.getForce() != LoopVectorizeHints::FK_Enabled && + bool OptForSize = Hints.getForce() != LoopVectorizeHints::FK_Enabled/* && // FIXME: Use Function::optForSize(). - F->hasFnAttribute(Attribute::OptimizeForSize); + F->hasFnAttribute(Attribute::OptimizeForSize)*/; // Compute the weighted frequency of this loop being executed and see if it // is less than 20% of the function entry baseline frequency. Note that we @@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ struct LoopVectorize : public FunctionPass { OptForSize = true; } - // Check the function attributes to see if implicit floats are allowed.a + // Check the function attributes to see if implicit floats are allowed. // FIXME: This check doesn't seem possibly correct -- what if the loop is // an integer loop and the vector instructions selected are purely integer // vector instructions? @@ -2402,7 +2402,7 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::vectorizeMemoryInstruction(Instruction *Instr) { Builder.CreateGEP(nullptr, Ptr, Builder.getInt32(Part * VF)); if (Reverse) { - // If we store to reverse consecutive memory locations then we need + // If we store to reverse consecutive memory locations, then we need // to reverse the order of elements in the stored value. StoredVal[Part] = reverseVector(StoredVal[Part]); // If the address is consecutive but reversed, then the @@ -2476,7 +2476,7 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::scalarizeInstruction(Instruction *Instr, bool IfPredic // Try using previously calculated values. Instruction *SrcInst = dyn_cast(SrcOp); - // If the src is an instruction that appeared earlier in the basic block + // If the src is an instruction that appeared earlier in the basic block, // then it should already be vectorized. if (SrcInst && OrigLoop->contains(SrcInst)) { assert(WidenMap.has(SrcInst) && "Source operand is unavailable"); -- 2.7.4