From 303e567a8062200dc06acde7c76fc34679f08d8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:24:30 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Check for integer overflow in cache size computation in strcoll strcoll is implemented using a cache for indices and weights of collation sequences in the strings so that subsequent passes do not have to search through collation data again. For very large string inputs, the cache size computation could overflow. In such a case, use the fallback function that does not cache indices and weights of collation sequences. Fixes CVE-2012-4412. --- ChangeLog | 6 +++++ NEWS | 6 +++++ string/Makefile | 2 ++ string/strcoll_l.c | 10 ++++++- string/tst-strcoll-overflow.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 string/tst-strcoll-overflow.c diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 148479e..17f65ed 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ 2013-09-23 Siddhesh Poyarekar [BZ #14547] + * string/tst-strcoll-overflow.c: New test case. + * string/Makefile (xtests): Add tst-strcoll-overflow. + * string/strcoll_l.c (STRCOLL): Skip allocating memory for + cache if string sizes may cause integer overflow. + + [BZ #14547] * string/strcoll_l.c (coll_seq): New members rule, idx, save_idx and back_us. (get_next_seq_nocache): New function. diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 0dbcdbf..138c735 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ Version 2.19 15867, 15886, 15887, 15890, 15892, 15893, 15895, 15897, 15905, 15909, 15919, 15921, 15923, 15939, 15963, 15966. +* CVE-2012-4412 The strcoll implementation caches indices and rules for + large collation sequences to optimize multiple passes. This cache + computation may overflow for large collation sequences and may cause a + stack or buffer overflow. This is now fixed to use a slower algorithm + which does not use a cache if there is an integer overflow. + * CVE-2012-4424 The strcoll implementation uses malloc to cache indices and rules for large collation sequences to optimize multiple passes and falls back to alloca if malloc fails, resulting in a possible stack overflow. diff --git a/string/Makefile b/string/Makefile index 7362828..c2c7d37 100644 --- a/string/Makefile +++ b/string/Makefile @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ tests := tester inl-tester noinl-tester testcopy test-ffs \ tests-ifunc := $(strop-tests:%=test-%-ifunc) tests += $(tests-ifunc) +xtests = tst-strcoll-overflow + include ../Rules tester-ENV = LANGUAGE=C diff --git a/string/strcoll_l.c b/string/strcoll_l.c index eb042ff..4ee101a 100644 --- a/string/strcoll_l.c +++ b/string/strcoll_l.c @@ -524,7 +524,15 @@ STRCOLL (const STRING_TYPE *s1, const STRING_TYPE *s2, __locale_t l) memset (&seq1, 0, sizeof (seq1)); seq2 = seq1; - if (! __libc_use_alloca ((s1len + s2len) * (sizeof (int32_t) + 1))) + size_t size_max = SIZE_MAX / (sizeof (int32_t) + 1); + + if (MIN (s1len, s2len) > size_max + || MAX (s1len, s2len) > size_max - MIN (s1len, s2len)) + { + /* If the strings are long enough to cause overflow in the size request, + then skip the allocation and proceed with the non-cached routines. */ + } + else if (! __libc_use_alloca ((s1len + s2len) * (sizeof (int32_t) + 1))) { seq1.idxarr = (int32_t *) malloc ((s1len + s2len) * (sizeof (int32_t) + 1)); diff --git a/string/tst-strcoll-overflow.c b/string/tst-strcoll-overflow.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bb665ac --- /dev/null +++ b/string/tst-strcoll-overflow.c @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +/* Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + This file is part of the GNU C Library. + + The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. + + The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + Lesser General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public + License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see + . */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* Verify that strcoll does not crash for large strings for which it cannot + cache weight lookup results. The size is large enough to cause integer + overflows on 32-bit as well as buffer overflows on 64-bit. The test should + work reasonably reliably when overcommit is disabled, but it obviously + depends on how much memory the system has. There's a limitation to this + test in that it does not run to completion. Actually collating such a + large string can take days and we can't have xcheck running that long. For + that reason, we run the test for about 5 minutes and then assume that + everything is fine if there are no crashes. */ +#define SIZE 0x40000000ul + +int +do_test (void) +{ + if (setlocale (LC_COLLATE, "en_GB.UTF-8") == NULL) + { + puts ("setlocale failed, cannot test for overflow"); + return 0; + } + + char *p = malloc (SIZE); + + if (p == NULL) + { + puts ("could not allocate memory"); + return 1; + } + + memset (p, 'x', SIZE - 1); + p[SIZE - 1] = 0; + printf ("%d\n", strcoll (p, p)); + return 0; +} + +#define TIMEOUT 300 +#define EXPECTED_SIGNAL SIGALRM +#define TEST_FUNCTION do_test () +#include "../test-skeleton.c" -- 2.7.4