From 2c28e2451dba2260e9f88811b29a7787db7e7616 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:57:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Fix TINY_RCU #elif condition Some compilers are happy with "#elif CONFIG_RCU_TINY", while others strongly prefer "#elif defined(CONFIG_RCU_TINY)". Change to the latter to make more compilers happy. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com LKML-Reference: <12565906642768-git-send-email-> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 6dd71fa..2f1bc42 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ extern int rcu_scheduler_active; #if defined(CONFIG_TREE_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU) #include -#elif CONFIG_TINY_RCU +#elif defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) #include #else #error "Unknown RCU implementation specified to kernel configuration" -- 2.7.4