From 2b20fd0ab497df5284743975e4204c1c2b03a397 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Skeggs Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:34:33 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/nva3/pm: initial attempt at handling 111100/111104 Probably not quite right, but this is enough now to make NVS300 reclock between all 3 of its perflvls correctly. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nva3_pm.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nva3_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nva3_pm.c index 3a23788..8cbe59a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nva3_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nva3_pm.c @@ -456,6 +456,9 @@ mclk_timing_set(struct nouveau_mem_exec_func *exec) if (info->ramcfg[2] & 0x02) unk718 |= 0x00000100; nv_wr32(dev, 0x100718, unk718); + + if (info->ramcfg[2] & 0x10) + nv_wr32(dev, 0x111100, 0x48000000); /*XXX*/ } } @@ -498,15 +501,33 @@ prog_mem(struct drm_device *dev, struct nva3_pm_state *info) nv_mask(dev, 0x004168, 0x003f3141, ctrl); } + if (info->ramcfg) { + if (info->ramcfg[2] & 0x10) { + nv_mask(dev, 0x111104, 0x00000600, 0x00000000); + } else { + nv_mask(dev, 0x111100, 0x40000000, 0x40000000); + nv_mask(dev, 0x111104, 0x00000180, 0x00000000); + } + } if (info->rammap && !(info->rammap[4] & 0x02)) nv_mask(dev, 0x100200, 0x00000800, 0x00000000); nv_wr32(dev, 0x611200, 0x00003300); + if (!(info->ramcfg[2] & 0x10)) + nv_wr32(dev, 0x111100, 0x4c020000); /*XXX*/ nouveau_mem_exec(&exec, info->perflvl); nv_wr32(dev, 0x611200, 0x00003330); if (info->rammap && (info->rammap[4] & 0x02)) nv_mask(dev, 0x100200, 0x00000800, 0x00000800); + if (info->ramcfg) { + if (info->ramcfg[2] & 0x10) { + nv_mask(dev, 0x111104, 0x00000180, 0x00000180); + nv_mask(dev, 0x111100, 0x40000000, 0x00000000); + } else { + nv_mask(dev, 0x111104, 0x00000600, 0x00000600); + } + } if (info->mclk.pll) { nv_mask(dev, 0x004168, 0x00000001, 0x00000000); -- 2.7.4