From 2aad9f81d34c3ecb6b5dbfd7c64a76298d40c361 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Oldman Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:50:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ssb: sprom: fix block comments coding style issues Fixed coding style issues Signed-off-by: John Oldman Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200424175043.16261-1-john.oldman@polehill.co.uk --- drivers/ssb/sprom.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c index 52d2e0f..42d620c 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c +++ b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_show(struct ssb_bus *bus, char *buf, /* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might * be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace - * to cancel operation. */ + * to cancel operation. + */ err = -ERESTARTSYS; if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex)) goto out_kfree; @@ -121,7 +122,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_store(struct ssb_bus *bus, /* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might * be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace - * to cancel operation. */ + * to cancel operation. + */ err = -ERESTARTSYS; if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex)) goto out_kfree; @@ -188,9 +190,11 @@ int ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out) bool ssb_is_sprom_available(struct ssb_bus *bus) { /* status register only exists on chipcomon rev >= 11 and we need check - for >= 31 only */ + * for >= 31 only + */ /* this routine differs from specs as we do not access SPROM directly - on PCMCIA */ + * on PCMCIA + */ if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI && bus->chipco.dev && /* can be unavailable! */ bus->chipco.dev->id.revision >= 31) -- 2.7.4