From 2a3d4f1f1f839e354ebd7d40b2d5d8ac8481a930 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:52:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] __crc_... is intended to be absolute i386 boot/compressed/relocs checks for absolute symbols and warns about unexpected ones. If you build with modversions, you get ~2500 warnings about __crc_. These suckers are really absolute symbols - we do _not_ want to modify them on relocation. They are generated by genksyms - EXPORT_... generates a weak alias, then genksyms produces an ld script with __crc_ = and it's fed to ld to produce the final object file. Their only use is to match kernel and module at modprobe time; they _must_ be absolute. boot/compressed/relocs has a whitelist of known absolute symbols, but it doesn't know about __crc_... stuff. As the result, we get shitloads of false positives on any ld(1) version. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/i386/boot/compressed/relocs.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/i386/boot/compressed/relocs.c b/arch/i386/boot/compressed/relocs.c index 468da89..881951c 100644 --- a/arch/i386/boot/compressed/relocs.c +++ b/arch/i386/boot/compressed/relocs.c @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ static int is_safe_abs_reloc(const char* sym_name) /* Match found */ return 1; } + if (strncmp(sym_name, "__crc_", 6) == 0) + return 1; return 0; } -- 2.7.4