From 2948be5acf7d798991b127ceda6eea13e52c597f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Minchan Kim Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 14:53:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm: do not use double negation for testing page flags With the discussion[1], I found it seems there are every PageFlags functions return bool at this moment so we don't need double negation any more. Although it's not a problem to keep it, it makes future users confused to use double negation for them, too. Remove such possibility. [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148881578820434 Frankly sepaking, I like every PageFlags to return bool instead of int. It will make it clear. AFAIR, Chen Gang had tried it but don't know why it was not merged at that time. http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469336184-1904-1-git-send-email-chengang@emindsoft.com.cn Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488868597-32222-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov Cc: Chen Gang Cc: Anshuman Khandual Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/khugepaged.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c index 88e4b17..7cb9c88 100644 --- a/mm/khugepaged.c +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, * The page must only be referenced by the scanned process * and page swap cache. */ - if (page_count(page) != 1 + !!PageSwapCache(page)) { + if (page_count(page) != 1 + PageSwapCache(page)) { unlock_page(page); result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT; goto out; @@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, * The page must only be referenced by the scanned process * and page swap cache. */ - if (page_count(page) != 1 + !!PageSwapCache(page)) { + if (page_count(page) != 1 + PageSwapCache(page)) { result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT; goto out_unmap; } -- 2.7.4