From 2794ed013b3551cbae887ea1b93c52aaacb7370d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Brandenburger Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 03:40:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix permissions of empty files not affected by umask When a new file is created with btrfs_create(), the inode will initially be created with permissions 0666 and later on in btrfs_init_acl() it will be adapted to mask out the umask bits. The problem is that this change won't make it into the btrfs_inode unless there's another change to the inode (e.g. writing content changing the size or touching the file changing the mtime.) This fix adds a call to btrfs_update_inode() to btrfs_create() to make sure that the change will not get lost if the in-memory inode is flushed before other changes are made to the file. Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger Reviewed-by: Liu Bo Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index a1761f0..adab791 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4951,6 +4951,12 @@ static int btrfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, goto out_unlock; } + err = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode); + if (err) { + drop_inode = 1; + goto out_unlock; + } + /* * If the active LSM wants to access the inode during * d_instantiate it needs these. Smack checks to see -- 2.7.4