From 23d599eb2377404100d0d1508e12b0a2c40b49b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:28:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract out the waiter iteration Split out the waiter iteration functions so they can be substituted for a rtmutex based ww_mutex later. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211304.509186185@linutronix.de --- kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h index 6a98f3b..1cd178c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h +++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h @@ -1,5 +1,49 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +static inline struct mutex_waiter * +__ww_waiter_first(struct mutex *lock) +{ + struct mutex_waiter *w; + + w = list_first_entry(&lock->wait_list, struct mutex_waiter, list); + if (list_entry_is_head(w, &lock->wait_list, list)) + return NULL; + + return w; +} + +static inline struct mutex_waiter * +__ww_waiter_next(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *w) +{ + w = list_next_entry(w, list); + if (list_entry_is_head(w, &lock->wait_list, list)) + return NULL; + + return w; +} + +static inline struct mutex_waiter * +__ww_waiter_prev(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *w) +{ + w = list_prev_entry(w, list); + if (list_entry_is_head(w, &lock->wait_list, list)) + return NULL; + + return w; +} + +static inline struct mutex_waiter * +__ww_waiter_last(struct mutex *lock) +{ + struct mutex_waiter *w; + + w = list_last_entry(&lock->wait_list, struct mutex_waiter, list); + if (list_entry_is_head(w, &lock->wait_list, list)) + return NULL; + + return w; +} + /* * Wait-Die: * The newer transactions are killed when: @@ -161,7 +205,9 @@ __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); - list_for_each_entry(cur, &lock->wait_list, list) { + for (cur = __ww_waiter_first(lock); cur; + cur = __ww_waiter_next(lock, cur)) { + if (!cur->ww_ctx) continue; @@ -263,8 +309,9 @@ __ww_mutex_check_kill(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter, * If there is a waiter in front of us that has a context, then its * stamp is earlier than ours and we must kill ourself. */ - cur = waiter; - list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(cur, &lock->wait_list, list) { + for (cur = __ww_waiter_prev(lock, waiter); cur; + cur = __ww_waiter_prev(lock, cur)) { + if (!cur->ww_ctx) continue; @@ -309,7 +356,9 @@ __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex_waiter *waiter, * may wound the lock holder. */ pos = &lock->wait_list; - list_for_each_entry_reverse(cur, &lock->wait_list, list) { + for (cur = __ww_waiter_last(lock); cur; + cur = __ww_waiter_prev(lock, cur)) { + if (!cur->ww_ctx) continue; -- 2.7.4