From 235f88dbc3494c49e0f361a5a3f78491f72ff47c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul A. Clarke" Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:18:28 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] docs: Fix 'modff' reference in extend.texi In commit a2a919aa501e3 (2003), built-ins for modf and modff were added. In extend.texi, section "Other Builtins", "modf" was added to the paragraph "There are also built-in versions of the ISO C99 functions [...]" and "modf" was also added to the paragraph "The ISO C90 functions [...]". "modff" was not added to either paragraph. Based on the context clues about where "modfl" and other similar function pairs like "powf/powl" appear, I believe the reference to "modf" in the first paragraph (C99) should instead be "modff". 2022-04-25 Paul A. Clarke gcc * doc/extend.texi (Other Builtins): Correct reference to 'modff'. --- gcc/doc/extend.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi index 931e5ae..84e6f66 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi @@ -13460,7 +13460,7 @@ There are also built-in versions of the ISO C99 functions @code{expl}, @code{fabsf}, @code{fabsl}, @code{floorf}, @code{floorl}, @code{fmodf}, @code{fmodl}, @code{frexpf}, @code{frexpl}, @code{ldexpf}, @code{ldexpl}, @code{log10f}, @code{log10l}, @code{logf}, @code{logl}, -@code{modfl}, @code{modf}, @code{powf}, @code{powl}, @code{sinf}, +@code{modfl}, @code{modff}, @code{powf}, @code{powl}, @code{sinf}, @code{sinhf}, @code{sinhl}, @code{sinl}, @code{sqrtf}, @code{sqrtl}, @code{tanf}, @code{tanhf}, @code{tanhl} and @code{tanl} that are recognized in any mode since ISO C90 reserves these names for -- 2.7.4