From 22fa90c7fb479694d6affebc049d21f06b714be6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Asias He Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 14:54:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] vhost: Remove custom vhost rcu usage Now, vq->private_data is always accessed under vq mutex. No need to play the vhost rcu trick. Signed-off-by: Asias He Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 16 ++++++---------- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 6 ++---- drivers/vhost/test.c | 6 ++---- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 10 ++-------- 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c index 99f8d63..969a859 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include @@ -749,8 +748,7 @@ static int vhost_net_enable_vq(struct vhost_net *n, struct vhost_poll *poll = n->poll + (nvq - n->vqs); struct socket *sock; - sock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data, - lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex)); + sock = vq->private_data; if (!sock) return 0; @@ -763,10 +761,9 @@ static struct socket *vhost_net_stop_vq(struct vhost_net *n, struct socket *sock; mutex_lock(&vq->mutex); - sock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data, - lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex)); + sock = vq->private_data; vhost_net_disable_vq(n, vq); - rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, NULL); + vq->private_data = NULL; mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); return sock; } @@ -922,8 +919,7 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd) } /* start polling new socket */ - oldsock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data, - lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex)); + oldsock = vq->private_data; if (sock != oldsock) { ubufs = vhost_net_ubuf_alloc(vq, sock && vhost_sock_zcopy(sock)); @@ -933,7 +929,7 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd) } vhost_net_disable_vq(n, vq); - rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, sock); + vq->private_data = sock; r = vhost_init_used(vq); if (r) goto err_used; @@ -967,7 +963,7 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd) return 0; err_used: - rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, oldsock); + vq->private_data = oldsock; vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq); if (ubufs) vhost_net_ubuf_put_wait_and_free(ubufs); diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c index 4536539..35ab0ce 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c @@ -1223,9 +1223,8 @@ vhost_scsi_set_endpoint(struct vhost_scsi *vs, sizeof(vs->vs_vhost_wwpn)); for (i = 0; i < VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ; i++) { vq = &vs->vqs[i].vq; - /* Flushing the vhost_work acts as synchronize_rcu */ mutex_lock(&vq->mutex); - rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, vs_tpg); + vq->private_data = vs_tpg; vhost_init_used(vq); mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); } @@ -1304,9 +1303,8 @@ vhost_scsi_clear_endpoint(struct vhost_scsi *vs, if (match) { for (i = 0; i < VHOST_SCSI_MAX_VQ; i++) { vq = &vs->vqs[i].vq; - /* Flushing the vhost_work acts as synchronize_rcu */ mutex_lock(&vq->mutex); - rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, NULL); + vq->private_data = NULL; mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); } } diff --git a/drivers/vhost/test.c b/drivers/vhost/test.c index a73ea21..339eae8 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/test.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/test.c @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include @@ -200,9 +199,8 @@ static long vhost_test_run(struct vhost_test *n, int test) priv = test ? n : NULL; /* start polling new socket */ - oldpriv = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data, - lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex)); - rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, priv); + oldpriv = vq->private_data; + vq->private_data = priv; r = vhost_init_used(&n->vqs[index]); diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h index 42298cd..4465ed5 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h @@ -103,14 +103,8 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue { struct iovec iov[UIO_MAXIOV]; struct iovec *indirect; struct vring_used_elem *heads; - /* We use a kind of RCU to access private pointer. - * All readers access it from worker, which makes it possible to - * flush the vhost_work instead of synchronize_rcu. Therefore readers do - * not need to call rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock: the beginning of - * vhost_work execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock() and the end of - * vhost_work execution acts instead of rcu_read_unlock(). - * Writers use virtqueue mutex. */ - void __rcu *private_data; + /* Protected by virtqueue mutex. */ + void *private_data; /* Log write descriptors */ void __user *log_base; struct vhost_log *log; -- 2.7.4