From 21e3c585f7c59fa909f6bb485a99bad33119a186 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Marek=20Ol=C5=A1=C3=A1k?= Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:29:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] r300g: don't call u_trim_pipe_prim in r300_swtcl_draw_vbo This was dead code anyway. --- src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_render.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_render.c b/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_render.c index dad6d2f..eca7c29 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_render.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_render.c @@ -801,7 +801,6 @@ static void r300_swtcl_draw_vbo(struct pipe_context* pipe, struct r300_context* r300 = r300_context(pipe); struct pipe_transfer *vb_transfer[PIPE_MAX_ATTRIBS]; struct pipe_transfer *ib_transfer = NULL; - unsigned count = info->count; int i; void *indices = NULL; boolean indexed = info->indexed && r300->index_buffer.buffer; @@ -810,10 +809,6 @@ static void r300_swtcl_draw_vbo(struct pipe_context* pipe, return; } - if (!u_trim_pipe_prim(info->mode, &count)) { - return; - } - r300_update_derived_state(r300); r300_reserve_cs_dwords(r300, -- 2.7.4