From 1ee05f9e6d32a43c029d31958ff91e5ca186ad4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:20:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Kick virtual siblings on timeslice out If we decide to timeslice out the current virtual request, we will unsubmit it while it is still busy (ve->context.inflight == sibling[0]). If the virtual tasklet and then the other sibling tasklets run before we completely schedule out the active virtual request for the preemption, those other tasklets will see that the virtul request is still inflight on sibling[0] and leave it be. Therefore when we finally schedule-out the virtual request and if we see that we have passed it back to the virtual engine, reschedule the virtual tasklet so that it may be resubmitted on any of the siblings. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519132046.22443-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c index d7ef3f8..7ee89d5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ static void kick_siblings(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce) struct virtual_engine *ve = container_of(ce, typeof(*ve), context); struct i915_request *next = READ_ONCE(ve->request); - if (next && next->execution_mask & ~rq->execution_mask) + if (next == rq || (next && next->execution_mask & ~rq->execution_mask)) tasklet_hi_schedule(&ve->base.execlists.tasklet); } -- 2.7.4