From 1e6f8bd15cf8447a42375b005476e02fc13deb2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Minghao Chi Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:01:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-tegra20-slink: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code Reported-by: Zeal Robot Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220418110141.2559019-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c index 80c3787..3836043 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c @@ -749,9 +749,8 @@ static int tegra_slink_setup(struct spi_device *spi) spi->mode & SPI_CPHA ? "" : "~", spi->max_speed_hz); - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tspi->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(tspi->dev); if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(tspi->dev); dev_err(tspi->dev, "pm runtime failed, e = %d\n", ret); return ret; } @@ -1169,9 +1168,8 @@ static int tegra_slink_resume(struct device *dev) struct tegra_slink_data *tspi = spi_master_get_devdata(master); int ret; - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev); if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); dev_err(dev, "pm runtime failed, e = %d\n", ret); return ret; } -- 2.7.4