From 1d10f6ee602ec5a4bd0c1606ba5f38277da432e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Beulich Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:29:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86: __force_order doesn't need to be an actual variable It being static causes over a dozen instances to be scattered across the kernel image, with non of them ever being referenced in any way. Making the variable extern without ever defining it works as well - all we need is to have the compiler think the variable is being accessed. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51A610B802000078000D99A0@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h index 41fc93a..2f4d924 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static inline void native_clts(void) * all loads stores around it, which can hurt performance. Solution is to * use a variable and mimic reads and writes to it to enforce serialization */ -static unsigned long __force_order; +extern unsigned long __force_order; static inline unsigned long native_read_cr0(void) { -- 2.7.4