From 1b1597e64e1a610c7a96710fc4717158e98a08b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Piotr Krysiuk Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:47:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Add sanity check for upper ptr_limit Given we know the max possible value of ptr_limit at the time of retrieving the latter, add basic assertions, so that the verifier can bail out if anything looks odd and reject the program. Nothing triggered this so far, but it also does not hurt to have these. Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index d16722a..44e4ec1 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -5861,10 +5861,14 @@ static int retrieve_ptr_limit(const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, { bool mask_to_left = (opcode == BPF_ADD && off_is_neg) || (opcode == BPF_SUB && !off_is_neg); - u32 off; + u32 off, max; switch (ptr_reg->type) { case PTR_TO_STACK: + /* Offset 0 is out-of-bounds, but acceptable start for the + * left direction, see BPF_REG_FP. + */ + max = MAX_BPF_STACK + mask_to_left; /* Indirect variable offset stack access is prohibited in * unprivileged mode so it's not handled here. */ @@ -5873,15 +5877,16 @@ static int retrieve_ptr_limit(const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, *ptr_limit = MAX_BPF_STACK + off; else *ptr_limit = -off - 1; - return 0; + return *ptr_limit >= max ? -ERANGE : 0; case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: + max = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size; if (mask_to_left) { *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->umax_value + ptr_reg->off; } else { off = ptr_reg->smin_value + ptr_reg->off; *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size - off - 1; } - return 0; + return *ptr_limit >= max ? -ERANGE : 0; default: return -EINVAL; } -- 2.7.4