From 1696785eabbaabfbc6615177fd150589a894e743 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Henderson Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:20:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] sibcall.c (optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_call): Suppress optimization if current_function_calls_setjmp. * sibcall.c (optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_call): Suppress optimization if current_function_calls_setjmp. From-SVN: r42880 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gcc/sibcall.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index b835dd9..0fb8a8c 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2001-06-04 Richard Henderson + + * sibcall.c (optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_call): Suppress + optimization if current_function_calls_setjmp. + 2001-06-04 Joseph S. Myers * doc/c-tree.texi: Fix documentation of TREE_STRING_LENGTH for diff --git a/gcc/sibcall.c b/gcc/sibcall.c index 53ce431..eefe080 100644 --- a/gcc/sibcall.c +++ b/gcc/sibcall.c @@ -617,11 +617,15 @@ optimize_sibling_and_tail_recursive_calls () /* See if there are any reasons we can't perform either sibling or tail call optimizations. We must be careful with stack slots - which are live at potential optimization sites. ?!? The first + which are live at potential optimization sites. ??? The first test is overly conservative and should be replaced. */ if (frame_offset /* Can't take address of local var if used by recursive call. */ || current_function_uses_addressof + /* Any function that calls setjmp might have longjmp called from + any called function. ??? We really should represent this + properly in the CFG so that this needn't be special cased. */ + || current_function_calls_setjmp /* Can't if more than one successor or single successor is not exit block. These two tests prevent tail call optimization in the presense of active exception handlers. */ -- 2.7.4