From 1683d3282f240336a2b4b6b541d435facfe8bbb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Cercueil Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:01:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: Don't use prefix for regulator name When a component has a prefix, and uses a SND_SOC_DAPM_REGULATOR_SUPPLY, the name of the regulator should not use the prefix, otherwise it won't be properly matched in the DT/ACPI. Fixes: 3caac759681e ("ASoC: soc-dapm.c: fixup snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked() error handling") Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025150149.113129-1-paul@crapouillou.net Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index d515e7a..879cf1b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -3645,7 +3645,7 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm, switch (w->id) { case snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply: - w->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dapm->dev, w->name); + w->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dapm->dev, widget->name); if (IS_ERR(w->regulator)) { ret = PTR_ERR(w->regulator); goto request_failed; -- 2.7.4