From 14af3f3c56103d8c3bb173c255ef5d89fb0c9350 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Harvey Harrison Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:25:50 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: sparse fixes for kvm/x86.c In two case statements, use the ever popular 'i' instead of index: arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1063:7: warning: symbol 'index' shadows an earlier one arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1000:9: originally declared here arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1079:7: warning: symbol 'index' shadows an earlier one arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1000:9: originally declared here Make it static. arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:1945:24: warning: symbol 'emulate_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? Drop the return statements. arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2878:2: warning: returning void-valued expression arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:2944:2: warning: returning void-valued expression Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 15bba5d..cf6261e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -1083,32 +1083,32 @@ static void do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function, } /* function 4 and 0xb have additional index. */ case 4: { - int index, cache_type; + int i, cache_type; entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX; /* read more entries until cache_type is zero */ - for (index = 1; *nent < maxnent; ++index) { - cache_type = entry[index - 1].eax & 0x1f; + for (i = 1; *nent < maxnent; ++i) { + cache_type = entry[i - 1].eax & 0x1f; if (!cache_type) break; - do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[index], function, index); - entry[index].flags |= + do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[i], function, i); + entry[i].flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX; ++*nent; } break; } case 0xb: { - int index, level_type; + int i, level_type; entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX; /* read more entries until level_type is zero */ - for (index = 1; *nent < maxnent; ++index) { - level_type = entry[index - 1].ecx & 0xff; + for (i = 1; *nent < maxnent; ++i) { + level_type = entry[i - 1].ecx & 0xff; if (!level_type) break; - do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[index], function, index); - entry[index].flags |= + do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[i], function, i); + entry[i].flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX; ++*nent; } @@ -1965,7 +1965,7 @@ void kvm_report_emulation_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *context) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_report_emulation_failure); -struct x86_emulate_ops emulate_ops = { +static struct x86_emulate_ops emulate_ops = { .read_std = emulator_read_std, .read_emulated = emulator_read_emulated, .write_emulated = emulator_write_emulated, @@ -2899,7 +2899,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs) static void get_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_segment *var, int seg) { - return kvm_x86_ops->get_segment(vcpu, var, seg); + kvm_x86_ops->get_segment(vcpu, var, seg); } void kvm_get_cs_db_l_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int *db, int *l) @@ -2965,7 +2965,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, static void set_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_segment *var, int seg) { - return kvm_x86_ops->set_segment(vcpu, var, seg); + kvm_x86_ops->set_segment(vcpu, var, seg); } int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, -- 2.7.4