From 13ca1a1be50180ccd700cff00a342156b1cdae8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandru Ardelean Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:22:21 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad9467: return ENODEV vs EINVAL in ad9467_setup() The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID isn't recognized. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916082221.72851-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c index 9c3ab46e4d88..f068256cfca9 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id) AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT; return 0; default: - return -EINVAL; + return -ENODEV; } } -- 2.34.1