From 0f94e87cdeaaac9f0f9a28a5dd2a5070b87cd3e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:32:53 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] md: fix data corruption when a degraded raid5 array is reshaped We currently do not wait for the block from the missing device to be computed from parity before copying data to the new stripe layout. The change in the raid6 code is not techincally needed as we don't delay data block recovery in the same way for raid6 yet. But making the change now is safer long-term. This bug exists in 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc Cc: Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Acked-by: Neil Brown Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c index a5aad8c..e8c8157 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -2865,7 +2865,8 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh) md_done_sync(conf->mddev, STRIPE_SECTORS, 1); } - if (s.expanding && s.locked == 0) + if (s.expanding && s.locked == 0 && + !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK, &sh->ops.pending)) handle_stripe_expansion(conf, sh, NULL); if (sh->ops.count) @@ -3067,7 +3068,8 @@ static void handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct page *tmp_page) md_done_sync(conf->mddev, STRIPE_SECTORS, 1); } - if (s.expanding && s.locked == 0) + if (s.expanding && s.locked == 0 && + !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK, &sh->ops.pending)) handle_stripe_expansion(conf, sh, &r6s); spin_unlock(&sh->lock); -- 2.7.4