From 0e49c54a8cbd3e779e5526a5888c683c01cc3c50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jon Roelofs Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:45:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [AArch64] Fix selection of G_UNMERGE <2 x s16> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106007 --- .../AArch64/GISel/AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp | 9 ++++- .../CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/select-unmerge.mir | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/GISel/AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/GISel/AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp index c0c00b3..ec4341f9 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/GISel/AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/GISel/AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp @@ -3988,6 +3988,13 @@ bool AArch64InstructionSelector::selectUnmergeValues(MachineInstr &I, } else { // No. We have to perform subregister inserts. For each insert, create an // implicit def and a subregister insert, and save the register we create. + const TargetRegisterClass *RC = + getMinClassForRegBank(*RBI.getRegBank(SrcReg, MRI, TRI), + WideTy.getScalarSizeInBits() * NumElts); + unsigned SubReg = 0; + bool Found = getSubRegForClass(RC, TRI, SubReg); + (void)Found; + assert(Found && "expected to find last operand's subeg idx"); for (unsigned Idx = 0; Idx < NumInsertRegs; ++Idx) { Register ImpDefReg = MRI.createVirtualRegister(&AArch64::FPR128RegClass); MachineInstr &ImpDefMI = @@ -4001,7 +4008,7 @@ bool AArch64InstructionSelector::selectUnmergeValues(MachineInstr &I, TII.get(TargetOpcode::INSERT_SUBREG), InsertReg) .addUse(ImpDefReg) .addUse(SrcReg) - .addImm(AArch64::dsub); + .addImm(SubReg); constrainSelectedInstRegOperands(ImpDefMI, TII, TRI, RBI); constrainSelectedInstRegOperands(InsMI, TII, TRI, RBI); diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/select-unmerge.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/select-unmerge.mir index 9565a37..2ea2711 100644 --- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/select-unmerge.mir +++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/select-unmerge.mir @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ ret <4 x float> %a } + define <2 x half> @test_v2s16_unmerge(<2 x half> %a) { + ret <2 x half> %a + } + define <4 x half> @test_v4s16_unmerge(<4 x half> %a) { ret <4 x half> %a } @@ -87,6 +91,49 @@ body: | RET_ReallyLR implicit $q0 ... --- +name: test_v2s16_unmerge +legalized: true +regBankSelected: true +tracksRegLiveness: true +registers: + - { id: 0, class: fpr } + - { id: 1, class: fpr } + - { id: 2, class: fpr } + - { id: 3, class: fpr } + - { id: 4, class: fpr } + - { id: 5, class: fpr } +body: | + bb.1 (%ir-block.0): + liveins: $s0 + ; CHECK-LABEL: name: test_v2s16_unmerge + + ; CHECK: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:fpr32 = COPY $s0 + %0:fpr(<2 x s16>) = COPY $s0 + + ; Since 2 * 16 != 128, we need to widen using implicit defs. + ; Note that we expect to reuse one of the INSERT_SUBREG results, as CPYi16 + ; expects a lane > 0. + ; CHECK: [[DEF:%[0-9]+]]:fpr128 = IMPLICIT_DEF + ; CHECK: [[INSERT_SUBREG:%[0-9]+]]:fpr128 = INSERT_SUBREG [[DEF]], [[COPY]], %subreg.ssub + ; CHECK: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:fpr16 = COPY [[INSERT_SUBREG]].hsub + ; CHECK: [[CPYi16_:%[0-9]+]]:fpr16 = CPYi16 [[INSERT_SUBREG]], 1 + %2:fpr(s16), %3:fpr(s16) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES %0(<2 x s16>) + + ; CHECK: [[DEF1:%[0-9]+]]:fpr128 = IMPLICIT_DEF + ; CHECK: [[INSERT_SUBREG1:%[0-9]+]]:fpr128 = INSERT_SUBREG [[DEF1]], [[COPY1]], %subreg.hsub + ; CHECK: [[DEF2:%[0-9]+]]:fpr128 = IMPLICIT_DEF + ; CHECK: [[INSERT_SUBREG2:%[0-9]+]]:fpr128 = INSERT_SUBREG [[DEF2]], [[CPYi16_]], %subreg.hsub + ; CHECK: [[INSvi16lane:%[0-9]+]]:fpr128 = INSvi16lane [[INSERT_SUBREG1]], 1, [[INSERT_SUBREG2]], 0 + ; CHECK: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:fpr32 = COPY [[INSvi16lane]].ssub + %1:fpr(<2 x s16>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR %2(s16), %3(s16) + + ; CHECK: $s0 = COPY [[COPY2]] + $s0 = COPY %1(<2 x s16>) + + ; CHECK: RET_ReallyLR implicit $s0 + RET_ReallyLR implicit $s0 +... +--- name: test_v4s16_unmerge alignment: 4 legalized: true -- 2.7.4