From 0cb637bff80d5ba2b916bb19f19ffd59cd4079fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:05:01 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: Don't DoS us with 'swiotlb buffer is full' (v2) There is no need for that so lets use ratelimiting. Also add some extra information to be helpful. Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini [v2: s/ld/zs on the printk] Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk --- lib/swiotlb.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index e4399fa..4634ac9 100644 --- a/lib/swiotlb.c +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c @@ -505,7 +505,8 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev, not_found: spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_tlb_lock, flags); - dev_warn(hwdev, "swiotlb buffer is full\n"); + if (printk_ratelimit()) + dev_warn(hwdev, "swiotlb buffer is full (sz: %zd bytes)\n", size); return SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR; found: spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_tlb_lock, flags); -- 2.7.4