From 0c1d1517d61610d343f3bee0602c21a858f67114 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roman Gushchin Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 19:35:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] writeback, cgroup: increment isw_nr_in_flight before grabbing an inode [ Upstream commit 8826ee4fe75051f8cbfa5d4a9aa70565938e724c ] isw_nr_in_flight is used to determine whether the inode switch queue should be flushed from the umount path. Currently it's increased after grabbing an inode and even scheduling the switch work. It means the umount path can walk past cleanup_offline_cgwb() with active inode references, which can result in a "Busy inodes after unmount." message and use-after-free issues (with inode->i_sb which gets freed). Fix it by incrementing isw_nr_in_flight before doing anything with the inode and decrementing in the case when switching wasn't scheduled. The problem hasn't yet been seen in the real life and was discovered by Jan Kara by looking into the code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210608230225.2078447-4-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin Suggested-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Dave Chinner Cc: Dennis Zhou Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 0d0f014..afda7a7 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -505,6 +505,8 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id) if (!isw) return; + atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight); + /* find and pin the new wb */ rcu_read_lock(); memcg_css = css_from_id(new_wb_id, &memory_cgrp_subsys); @@ -535,11 +537,10 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id) * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible. */ call_rcu(&isw->rcu_head, inode_switch_wbs_rcu_fn); - - atomic_inc(&isw_nr_in_flight); return; out_free: + atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight); if (isw->new_wb) wb_put(isw->new_wb); kfree(isw); -- 2.7.4