From 0b8cfb6aa3aabc96177b1e68ef13d2eb5c686606 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:11:25 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] PCI: designware: Use typical "for" loop idiom It's conventional to use "for" rather than "while" for simple iteration. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas --- drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c index 5274085..1c92833 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c @@ -214,8 +214,7 @@ static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base, { unsigned int i, res, bit, val; - i = 0; - while (i < nvec) { + for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) { irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq_base, i, NULL); clear_bit(pos + i, pp->msi_irq_in_use); /* Disable corresponding interrupt on MSI interrupt controller */ @@ -224,7 +223,6 @@ static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base, dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val); val &= ~(1 << bit); dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val); - ++i; } } @@ -268,8 +266,7 @@ static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos) * descs are also successfully allocated. */ - i = 0; - while (i < no_irqs) { + for (i = 0; i < no_irqs; i++) { if (irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq, i, desc) != 0) { clear_irq_range(pp, irq, i, pos0); goto no_valid_irq; @@ -281,7 +278,6 @@ static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos) dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, &val); val |= 1 << bit; dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val); - i++; } *pos = pos0; -- 2.7.4