From 09974a1352d3479748cfb08dbfc39a3c019e4486 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anand Jain Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 19:16:34 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: use the correct superblock to compare fsid in btrfs_validate_super commit d167aa76dc0683828588c25767da07fb549e4f48 upstream. The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the fsid in the provided superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to do that. Such as in the following stack: write_all_supers() sb = fs_info->super_for_commit; btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb) btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..) scrub_one_super() btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..) And check_dev_super() btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..) However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::fsid instead, which is not correct. Fix this using the correct fsid in the superblock argument. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli Signed-off-by: Anand Jain Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 96369c4..64daae6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -2721,11 +2721,10 @@ int btrfs_validate_super(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ret = -EINVAL; } - if (memcmp(fs_info->fs_devices->fsid, fs_info->super_copy->fsid, - BTRFS_FSID_SIZE)) { + if (memcmp(fs_info->fs_devices->fsid, sb->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) != 0) { btrfs_err(fs_info, "superblock fsid doesn't match fsid of fs_devices: %pU != %pU", - fs_info->super_copy->fsid, fs_info->fs_devices->fsid); + sb->fsid, fs_info->fs_devices->fsid); ret = -EINVAL; } -- 2.7.4