From 074003c8e22d5d6c0ee7d6e38e78e9b5832b22dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Craig Topper Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:14:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [X86] Fix an assert that was incorrectly checking for BMI instead of AVX512VBMI. The check is actually unnecessary since AVX512VBMI implies AVX512BW which is the other part of the assert. llvm-svn: 319006 --- llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp index 892c7e2..5f4e4d7 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp @@ -2149,8 +2149,7 @@ static void Passv64i1ArgInRegs( const SDLoc &Dl, SelectionDAG &DAG, SDValue Chain, SDValue &Arg, SmallVector, 8> &RegsToPass, CCValAssign &VA, CCValAssign &NextVA, const X86Subtarget &Subtarget) { - assert((Subtarget.hasBWI() || Subtarget.hasBMI()) && - "Expected AVX512BW or AVX512BMI target!"); + assert(Subtarget.hasBWI() && "Expected AVX512BW target!"); assert(Subtarget.is32Bit() && "Expecting 32 bit target"); assert(Arg.getValueType() == MVT::i64 && "Expecting 64 bit value"); assert(VA.isRegLoc() && NextVA.isRegLoc() && -- 2.7.4