From 063f0d1567f26497b90d269c0403e374b4d1ad8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josh Coalson <jcoalson@users.sourceforce.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:07:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] update "free codecs" verbiage

---
 doc/html/comparison.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/html/comparison.html b/doc/html/comparison.html
index 153c76a..2b0238d 100644
--- a/doc/html/comparison.html
+++ b/doc/html/comparison.html
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
 	<P>
 	<UL>
 		<LI>
-			As far as I know, only three of the lossless encoders out there (Bonk, flac and Kexis) are truly free (source code for Shorten and Monkey's Audio is available but the licenses are more restrictive).  Most others give out free binaries, but without access to the source, you are leaving your data to the whim of the maintainer for eternity; you have no way to port the program to another OS or fix it if it breaks.  This can be a serious drawback unless the format has world-class clout (like MP3).
+			As far as I know, only two of the lossless encoders out there (FLAC and WavPack) are both actively developed and truly free (source code for Shorten and Monkey's Audio is available but the licenses are more restrictive).  Most others give out free binaries, but without access to the source, you are leaving your data to the whim of the maintainer for eternity; you have no way to port the program to another OS or fix it if it breaks.  This can be a serious drawback unless the format has world-class clout (like MP3).
 		</LI>
 		<LI>
 			The compression ratios and times for flac are representative only of the reference encoder.  They are not indicative of the limits of all FLAC encoders or the FLAC format itself since the format is open and extensible, and anyone is free to write a better FLAC encoder.  And it is almost certain that the reference encoder itself will improve.
-- 
2.7.4