From 039ae8bcf7a5f4476f4487e6bf816885fb3fb617 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vincent Guittot Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:14:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in the load balancing path This re-applies the commit reverted here: commit c40f7d74c741 ("sched/fair: Fix infinite loop in update_blocked_averages() by reverting a9e7f6544b9c") I.e. now that cfs_rq can be safely removed/added in the list, we can re-apply: commit a9e7f6544b9c ("sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in load balance path") Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: sargun@sargun.me Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: xiexiuqi@huawei.com Cc: xiezhipeng1@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1549469662-13614-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 027f8e1..17a9615 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -368,9 +368,10 @@ static inline void assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(struct rq *rq) SCHED_WARN_ON(rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list); } -/* Iterate through all cfs_rq's on a runqueue in bottom-up order */ -#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \ - list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list) +/* Iterate thr' all leaf cfs_rq's on a runqueue */ +#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe(rq, cfs_rq, pos) \ + list_for_each_entry_safe(cfs_rq, pos, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, \ + leaf_cfs_rq_list) /* Do the two (enqueued) entities belong to the same group ? */ static inline struct cfs_rq * @@ -461,8 +462,8 @@ static inline void assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(struct rq *rq) { } -#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \ - for (cfs_rq = &rq->cfs; cfs_rq; cfs_rq = NULL) +#define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe(rq, cfs_rq, pos) \ + for (cfs_rq = &rq->cfs, pos = NULL; cfs_rq; cfs_rq = pos) static inline struct sched_entity *parent_entity(struct sched_entity *se) { @@ -7702,10 +7703,27 @@ static inline bool others_have_blocked(struct rq *rq) #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED +static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) +{ + if (cfs_rq->load.weight) + return false; + + if (cfs_rq->avg.load_sum) + return false; + + if (cfs_rq->avg.util_sum) + return false; + + if (cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_sum) + return false; + + return true; +} + static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu) { struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu); - struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, *pos; const struct sched_class *curr_class; struct rq_flags rf; bool done = true; @@ -7717,7 +7735,7 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu) * Iterates the task_group tree in a bottom up fashion, see * list_add_leaf_cfs_rq() for details. */ - for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) { + for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe(rq, cfs_rq, pos) { struct sched_entity *se; if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq)) @@ -7728,6 +7746,13 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu) if (se && !skip_blocked_update(se)) update_load_avg(cfs_rq_of(se), se, 0); + /* + * There can be a lot of idle CPU cgroups. Don't let fully + * decayed cfs_rqs linger on the list. + */ + if (cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq)) + list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); + /* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */ if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq)) done = false; @@ -10609,10 +10634,10 @@ const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = { #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG void print_cfs_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu) { - struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq; + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, *pos; rcu_read_lock(); - for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(cpu_rq(cpu), cfs_rq) + for_each_leaf_cfs_rq_safe(cpu_rq(cpu), cfs_rq, pos) print_cfs_rq(m, cpu, cfs_rq); rcu_read_unlock(); } -- 2.7.4