From 019c8d9d1511a07d2004667d2240f3e47cb991ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arkady Shlykov Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:46:46 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [NFC] Adjust test cases numbering, test commit. Summary: Test case test14 is missing, adjust the numbering to have a consecutive range. Also a test commit to verify commit access. --- llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-conditions.ll | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-conditions.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-conditions.ll index b44b616..5c84884 100644 --- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-conditions.ll +++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-conditions.ll @@ -1024,8 +1024,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body } ; No peeling is profitable here. -define void @test15__ivar_mod2_is_1(i32 %len) { -; CHECK-LABEL: @test15__ivar_mod2_is_1( +define void @test14__ivar_mod2_is_1(i32 %len) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @test14__ivar_mod2_is_1( ; CHECK-NEXT: entry: ; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP5:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[LEN:%.*]], 0 ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP5]], label [[FOR_BODY_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND_CLEANUP:%.*]] @@ -1074,8 +1074,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body } ; No peeling is profitable here. -define void @test16__ivar_mod2_is_0(i32 %len) { -; CHECK-LABEL: @test16__ivar_mod2_is_0( +define void @test15__ivar_mod2_is_0(i32 %len) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @test15__ivar_mod2_is_0( ; CHECK-NEXT: entry: ; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP5:%.*]] = icmp sgt i32 [[LEN:%.*]], 0 ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP5]], label [[FOR_BODY_PREHEADER:%.*]], label [[FOR_COND_CLEANUP:%.*]] @@ -1125,8 +1125,8 @@ if.end: ; preds = %if.then, %for.body ; Similar to @test7, we need to peel one extra iteration, and we can't do that ; as per the -unroll-peel-max-count=4, so this shouldn't be peeled at all. -define void @test17(i32 %k) { -; CHECK-LABEL: @test17( +define void @test16(i32 %k) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @test16( ; CHECK-NEXT: for.body.lr.ph: ; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]] ; CHECK: for.body: @@ -1166,8 +1166,8 @@ for.end: ; Similar to @test8, we need to peel one extra iteration, and we can't do that ; as per the -unroll-peel-max-count=4, so this shouldn't be peeled at all. -define void @test18(i32 %k) { -; CHECK-LABEL: @test18( +define void @test17(i32 %k) { +; CHECK-LABEL: @test17( ; CHECK-NEXT: for.body.lr.ph: ; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[FOR_BODY:%.*]] ; CHECK: for.body: -- 2.7.4