From a752359f2b0a291c5f229e883842e4b30c698387 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yi Zou Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:40:31 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [SCSI] libfc: fix sending REC after FCP_RESP is received This is exposed in the case the FCP_DATA frames somehow got lost and fc_fcp got the FCP_RSP, in fc_fcp_recv_resp(), since xfer_len is less than the expected_len it resets the the timer to wait to 2 more jiffies in case the data frames are already queued locally. However, for target does not support REC, it would just send RJT w/ ELS_RJT_UNSUP. The rec response handler thus only clears the rport flag for not doing REC later, but does not do fcp_io_complete() on the associated fsp. The fix is just check status of FCP_RSP being received already, i.e. using the FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS flag, in fc_fcp_timeout before start sending REC. We should have waited long enough if there is truely data frames queued locally. Signed-off-by: Yi Zou Tested-by: Ross Brattain Signed-off-by: Robert Love Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c index 3c96e93..14243fa 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c @@ -1380,10 +1380,10 @@ static void fc_fcp_timeout(unsigned long data) fsp->state |= FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO; - if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED) - fc_fcp_rec(fsp); - else if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS) + if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS) fc_fcp_complete_locked(fsp); + else if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED) + fc_fcp_rec(fsp); else fc_fcp_recovery(fsp, FC_TIMED_OUT); fsp->state &= ~FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO; -- 2.7.4